<?php
/**
 * <https://y.st./>
 * Copyright © 2018 Alex Yst <mailto:copyright@y.st>
 * 
 * This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
 * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
 * the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
 * (at your option) any later version.
 * 
 * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
 * GNU General Public License for more details.
 * 
 * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
 * along with this program. If not, see <https://www.gnu.org./licenses/>.
**/

$xhtml = array(
	'<{title}>' => 'Finishing up for the week',
	'takedown' => '2017-11-01',
	'<{body}>' => <<<END
<img src="/img/CC_BY-SA_4.0/y.st./weblog/2018/08/01.jpg" alt="The street, as seen just after the overpass" class="framed-centred-image" width="649" height="480"/>
<section id="drudgery">
	<h2>Drudgery</h2>
	<p>
		My discussion posts for the day:
	</p>
	<blockquote>
		<p>
			The cowardly lion is one one my favourite characters from the series.
			He claims to be cowardly, but he&apos;s actually just fearful.
			Without fear, there can be no cowardice, but there can also be no bravery.
			Bravery is to face one&apos;s fears head-on, after all.
		</p>
		<p>
			But yeah, he&apos;s also a kind-hearted soul.
			He doesn&apos;t actually want to hurt anyone; otherwise, Ozma wouldn&apos;t love him so much.
			If he actually wanted to harm anyone, he wouldn&apos;t be one of her private bodyguards.
			He&apos;s really just shooting the wind with the hungry tiger, making up stories of what he&apos;d like to do.
			The though of actually acting on those words appals him, as evidenced in his reaction to the tiger&apos;s criticism.
		</p>
		<p>
			Strangely, I don&apos;t get much of a feel for the tiger&apos;s character.
			I assume he&apos;s meant to be kind-hearted as well, but even after reading the entire Oz series, the character of the hungery tiger appears rather flat.
		</p>
	</blockquote>
	<blockquote>
		<p>
			It&apos;s interesting that you should bring up omens, and with them, superstition itself.
			I hadn&apos;t even considered superstitions when writing up my post.
		</p>
		<p>
			Your other examples were great as well.
			They all make a lot of sense.
			I hadn&apos;t thought about that iron example, as I never do any ironing, but the logic seems pretty sound.
			The remaining two beliefs are common and well-accepted as well.
		</p>
	</blockquote>
	<blockquote>
		<p>
			Ha ha, you kidnapped a poor little kitten!
			Anyway ...
		</p>
		<p>
			You make a good point about street signs.
			Though I&apos;d argue the authority doesn&apos;t come from the signs themselves, but from the laws.
			This seems obvious, but it actually has important implications.
			It&apos;s a great example of how authoritative because the fact that it was said makes it true.
			The creation of the speed limit laws sets the legal speed limit for the area, therefore, the legal speed limit is as the law declares it.
		</p>
	</blockquote>
	<blockquote>
		<p>
			Personally, I find censorship to be insufferable.
			I abhor being censored.
			Therefore, I view it as intuitively wrong.
			Then again, good and bad tend to be relative, so there is no actual proof of something such as censorship being as terrible as I believe it is.
		</p>
	</blockquote>
</section>
END
);
